АНТРОПОЦЕНТРИЧНИЙ ВЕКТОР ДОСЛІДЖЕННЯ МОНОМОДАЛЬНОГО ХУДОЖНЬОГО ТЕКСТУ В ДОБУ ЦИФРОВІЗАЦІЇ
Ключові слова:
антропоцентризм, мономодальний текст, цифровізація, Big Data, художня комунікація, автор, читач, філологічний аналіз, семіотичний код, наративна організація
Анотація
У статті описано трансформацію теоретико-методологічного інструментарію філологічного аналізу художнього тексту в контексті переходу від традиційної мономодальної статичності до динамічного цифрового середовища. Актуальність дослідження зумовлена потребою переосмислення класичних підходів до інтерпретації літературного твору в умовах глобальної цифровізації та поширення технологій штучного інтелекту. Автор обґрунтовує тезу про те, що антропоцентризм, який сформувався як світоглядне переконання ще в епоху Відродження, залишається єдиним надійним орієнтиром для сучасної філологічної думки. Незважаючи на стрімкий технологічний прогрес, що намагається замінити суб’єктивне емоційно-інтелектуальне прочитання алгоритмізованими методами опрацювання великих даних (Big Data), людина продовжує перебувати в центрі художнього всесвіту. Мономодальний художній текст розглядається не як автономна семіотична структура, а як живий акт комунікації між автором і читачем, як віддзеркалення свідомості митця та об’єкт рефлексії реципієнта. Особливу увагу приділено аналізу мономодального художнього тексту, що ґрунтується виключно на вербальному коді. Визначено, що в мультимодальному суспільстві, де домінують змішані семіотичні коди, відбувається певна ревізія мовних ігор та модифікація наративної організації. Аналізується потенціал алгоритмів щодо відтворення антропоцентричної природи творчого процесу в ході генерації або опрацювання текстових даних. У статті доведено, що цифрові реалії не обезлюднюють літературу, а навпаки – створюють нові умови для еволюції антропоцентричного вектору. Головним завданням сучасного філологічного аналізу визначено збереження вербальної традиції при одночасному забезпеченні дієвого контакту з читачем у новій моделі зовнішньо текстової комунікації: письменник ↔ читач. Стаття пропонує системний погляд на те, як методологія аналізу адаптується до цифрової динаміки, не втрачаючи при цьому своєї гуманістичної сутності.
Посилання
1. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. N. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56–311). Cambridge University Press.
2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans., pp. 259–422). University of Texas Press.
3. Barthes, R. (1977). "From Work to Text." In Image-Music-Text (S. Heath, Trans.). New York: Hill and Wang. 220 p., – P. 159.
4. Bekhta, I. (2004). Hypertext as an alternative model of conventional text in the postmodern era. Linguistic and Conceptual Pictures of the World, 11(1), рр. 38 – 41.
5. Black, E. (2006). Pragmatic stylistics. Edinburgh University Press, 203 p.
6. Boorman, L. (2025). Grammar and twentiethcentury American literature. Edinburgh, United Kingdom: Edinburgh University Press, 288 p.
7. Burke, M. (Ed.). (2014). The Routledge handbook of stylistics. London: Routledge, 558 p.
8. Carter, R., & Simpson, P. (Eds.). (1989). Language, discourse and literature: An introductory reader in discourse stylistics. London: Unwin Hyman, 298 p.
9. Carter, R., & Simpson, P. (Eds.). (1989). Language, discourse and literature: An introductory reader in discourse stylistics. London, Routledge, 298 p.
10. Chapman, S., & Clark, B. (Eds.). (2014). Pragmatic literary stylistics. Palgrave Macmillan, 205 p.
11. Dawson, P. (2013). The return of the omniscient narrator: Authorship and novelistic form. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 296 p.
12. de Beaugrande, R., & Dressler, W. (1981). Introduction to text linguistics. London & New York: Longman, 270 р.
13. Derrida, J., & Ronell, A. (1980). The law of genre. Critical Inquiry, 7(1), 55 – 81.
14. Duff, D. (Ed.). (2000). Modern genre theory. Harlow: Longman, 297 p.
15. Eckardt, R. (2014). The semantics of free indirect discourse: How texts allow us to mind-read and eavesdrop. Leiden / Boston: Brill, 283 p.
16. Enkvist, N. E. (1991). On the interpretability of texts in general and of literary texts in particular. In R. D. Sell (Ed.), Literary pragmatics (pp. 1–25). Routledge.
17. Eve, M. P. (2022). The digital humanities and literary studies. Oxford University Press, 180 p.
18. Fowler, A. (1982). Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 357 p.
19. Fowler, R. (1996). Linguistic criticism (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 274 p.
20. Frege, G. (1892). Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100, 25 – 50.
21. Frege, G. (1952). On sense and reference (P. Geach & M. Black, Trans.). In P. Geach & M. Black (Eds.), Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege (pp. 56–78). Basil Blackwell. (Original work published 1892)
22. Frow, J. (2005). Genre. London: Routledge, 184 p.
23. Frye, N. (1957). Anatomy of criticism: Four essays. Princeton, New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press, 383 p.
24. Gadamer, H-G. (2004). Truth and Method. London: Continuum Publishing Group. 601 p.
25. Gavins, J. (2007). Text world theory: An introduction. Edinburgh University Press, 208 p.
26. Giovanelli, M., & Harrison, C. (2024). Cognitive grammar in stylistics: A practical guide. Bloomsbury Academic, 256 p.
27. Givón, T. (2004). The grammar of perspective in narrative fiction. In T. Givón, The grammar of mind: An evolutionary perspective (pp. 209–243). Oxford University Press.
28. Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18(3), 213 – 231.
29. Goffman, E. (1967). On face-work. In E. Goffman, Interaction ritual: Essays on face-toface behavior (pp. 5–45). Anchor Books.
30. Greimas, A. J. (1983). Structural semantics: An attempt at a method (D. McDowell, R. Schleifer, & A. Velie, Trans.). University of Nebraska Press. (Original work published 1966), 325p.
31. Greimas, A. J. (1983). Structural semantics: An attempt at a method (D. McDowell, R. Schleifer, & A. Velie, Trans.). University of Nebraska Press. (Original work published 1966) “Reflections on Actantial Models” chapter 10. pp. 172–221.
32. Greimas, A. J. (1987). Elements of a narrative grammar. In On meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory (pp. 63–83). translated by Paul J. Perron and Frank H. Collins, University of Minnesota Press, 237 p.
33. Halliday, M. A. K. (1971). Linguistic function and literary style: An inquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors. In S. Chatman (Ed.), Literary style: A symposium (pp. 330–368). Oxford University Press.
34. Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. Edward Arnold, 143 p.
35. Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman. xv, 374 p.
36. Hamon, P. (1991). The expository device: A structural study of description. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 206 p.
37. Harrison, C., Nuttall, L., Stockwell, P., & Yuan, W. (Eds.). (2014). Cognitive grammar in literature. John Benjamins Publishing, 256 p.
38. Hartung, J., & Elpelt, B. B. (1997). Hypertext als Gegenstand linguistischer Forschung [Hypertext as an object of linguistic research]. In G. Antos & H. Tietz (Eds.), Textstrukturen im Medienwandel (Vol. 10, pp. 19–34). Peter Lang.
39. Hickey, L. (Ed.). (1989). The Pragmatics of Style. London: Routledge.207 p.
40. Hjelmslev, L. (1961/1963). Prolegomena to a theory of language (F. J. Whitfield, Trans.; Revised ed.). University of Wisconsin Press. (Original work published 1943) 144 p.
41. Humboldt, W. von. (1999). On language: On the diversity of human language construction and its influence on the mental development of the human species (M. Losonsky, Ed.; P. Heath, Trans.). Cambridge University Press, 296 p.
42. Underhill, J. W. (2009). Humboldt, worldview and language. Edinburgh University Press, 176 p.
43. Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). MIT Press.
44. Jeffries, L. (2010). Critical stylistics: The power of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 216 p.
45. Jeffries, L., & McIntyre, D. (2010). Stylistics. Cambridge University Press, 264 p. Simpson, P. (2014). Stylistics: A resource book for students(2nd ed.). Routledge, 332 p.
46. Jensen, K. E. (2014). Linguistics in the digital humanities: (Computational) corpus linguistics. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 30(57), 117–134.
47. Kristeva, J. (1980). Word, Dialogue and Novel. In L. S. Roudiez (Ed.), T. Gora, A. Jardine, & L. S. Roudiez (Trans.), Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art (pp. 62–91). New York: Columbia University Press
48. Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press, 572 p.
49. Lecercle, J.-J. (1999). Interpretation as Pragmatics. London: Macmillan, 1999, 260 p.
50. Leech, G., & Short, M. (2007). Style in fiction: Alinguistic introduction to English fictional prose (2nd ed.). Pearson Longman, 424 p.
51. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 420 p.
52. Locher, M. A., Jucker, A. H., Landert, D., & Messerli, T. C. (2023). Fiction and pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, 86 p.
53. Lodge, D. (1992). The Art of Fiction. London: Penguin Books, 240 p.
54. Makhachashvili, R. (2022). Digital transformation of linguistics and education in the post-pandemic era. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Humanities (pp. 45–50). Humanities Press.
55. McIntyre, D., & Walker, B. (2019). Corpus stylistics: Theory and practice. Edinburgh University Press, 376 p.
56. Melnychuk О., Bekhta І., Tkachivska M. (2023). Pearson Correlation Coefficient in Studying the Meaning of a Literary Text // Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Systems (COLINS 2023). Volume II: Computational Linguistics Workshop. Kharkiv, Ukraine, April 20-21. 2023, P. 460 – 477.
57. Pilkington, A. (2000). Poetic effects: A relevance theory perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 209 p.
58. Pratt, M. L. (1977). Toward a speech act theory of literary discourse. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 236 p.
59. Predelli, S. (2020). Fictional discourse: A radical fictionalist semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 194 p.
60. Prince, G. (1973). A grammar of stories: An introduction. Mouton,106 p.
61. Prince, G. (1982). Narratology: The form and functioning of narrative. Mouton, 191 p.
62. Prince, G. (1987/2003). A dictionary of narratology. University of Nebraska Press, 118 p / 126 p.
63. Prince, G. (1992). Narrative as theme: Studies in French fiction. University of Nebraska Press, 161 p.
64. Rastier, F. (1997). Meaning and textuality (F. Collins & P. Perron, Trans.). University of Toronto Press, 281 p.
65. Ricoeur, P. (1981). "What is a Text? Explanation and Understanding." In J.B. Thompson (Ed. & Trans.), Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Pp. 145 – 164.
66. Ryan, M.-L. (1991). Possible worlds, artificial intelligence, and narrative theory. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 291 p.
67. Saussure, F. de. (1959). Course in general linguistics (C. Bally & A. Sechehaye, Eds.; W. Baskin, Trans.). Philosophical Library. (Original work published 1916), 240 p.
68. Sell, R. D. (Ed.). (1991). Literary pragmatics. London, England: Routledge, 264 p.
69. Shen D. (2025). Discourse and style. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis, 218 p. Fowler, R. (1986). Linguistic criticism. Oxford University Press, 190 p.
70. Shen D. (2025). Discourse and style. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis. 218 p. Fowler, R. (1986). Linguistic criticism. Oxford University Press, 190 p.
71. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Blackwell, 338 p.
72. Stockwell, P. (2019). Cognitive poetics: An introduction (2nd ed.). London: Routledge, 256 p.
73. Stockwell, P., & Whiteley, S. (Eds.). (2014). The Cambridge handbook of stylistics. Cambridge University Press, 690 p.
74. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 388 p.
75. Toolan, M. (2001). Narrative: A critical linguistic introduction (2nd ed.). London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis, 272 p.
76. Toolan, M. (1998). Language in Literature: An Introduction to Stylistics. London: Arnold, 264 p.
77. Trier, J. (1931). Der deutsche Wortschatz im Sinnbezirk des Verstandes: Von den Anfängen bis zum Beginn des 13. Jahrhunderts. Winter, 347 p.
78. Underhill, J. W. (2009). Humboldt, worldview and language. Edinburgh University Press., 176 p.
79. van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Text and context: Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. Longman, 261 p.
80. Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (J. B. Carroll, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work consists of 278 p.
81. Wittgenstein L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 232 p.
2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans., pp. 259–422). University of Texas Press.
3. Barthes, R. (1977). "From Work to Text." In Image-Music-Text (S. Heath, Trans.). New York: Hill and Wang. 220 p., – P. 159.
4. Bekhta, I. (2004). Hypertext as an alternative model of conventional text in the postmodern era. Linguistic and Conceptual Pictures of the World, 11(1), рр. 38 – 41.
5. Black, E. (2006). Pragmatic stylistics. Edinburgh University Press, 203 p.
6. Boorman, L. (2025). Grammar and twentiethcentury American literature. Edinburgh, United Kingdom: Edinburgh University Press, 288 p.
7. Burke, M. (Ed.). (2014). The Routledge handbook of stylistics. London: Routledge, 558 p.
8. Carter, R., & Simpson, P. (Eds.). (1989). Language, discourse and literature: An introductory reader in discourse stylistics. London: Unwin Hyman, 298 p.
9. Carter, R., & Simpson, P. (Eds.). (1989). Language, discourse and literature: An introductory reader in discourse stylistics. London, Routledge, 298 p.
10. Chapman, S., & Clark, B. (Eds.). (2014). Pragmatic literary stylistics. Palgrave Macmillan, 205 p.
11. Dawson, P. (2013). The return of the omniscient narrator: Authorship and novelistic form. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 296 p.
12. de Beaugrande, R., & Dressler, W. (1981). Introduction to text linguistics. London & New York: Longman, 270 р.
13. Derrida, J., & Ronell, A. (1980). The law of genre. Critical Inquiry, 7(1), 55 – 81.
14. Duff, D. (Ed.). (2000). Modern genre theory. Harlow: Longman, 297 p.
15. Eckardt, R. (2014). The semantics of free indirect discourse: How texts allow us to mind-read and eavesdrop. Leiden / Boston: Brill, 283 p.
16. Enkvist, N. E. (1991). On the interpretability of texts in general and of literary texts in particular. In R. D. Sell (Ed.), Literary pragmatics (pp. 1–25). Routledge.
17. Eve, M. P. (2022). The digital humanities and literary studies. Oxford University Press, 180 p.
18. Fowler, A. (1982). Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 357 p.
19. Fowler, R. (1996). Linguistic criticism (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 274 p.
20. Frege, G. (1892). Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100, 25 – 50.
21. Frege, G. (1952). On sense and reference (P. Geach & M. Black, Trans.). In P. Geach & M. Black (Eds.), Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege (pp. 56–78). Basil Blackwell. (Original work published 1892)
22. Frow, J. (2005). Genre. London: Routledge, 184 p.
23. Frye, N. (1957). Anatomy of criticism: Four essays. Princeton, New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press, 383 p.
24. Gadamer, H-G. (2004). Truth and Method. London: Continuum Publishing Group. 601 p.
25. Gavins, J. (2007). Text world theory: An introduction. Edinburgh University Press, 208 p.
26. Giovanelli, M., & Harrison, C. (2024). Cognitive grammar in stylistics: A practical guide. Bloomsbury Academic, 256 p.
27. Givón, T. (2004). The grammar of perspective in narrative fiction. In T. Givón, The grammar of mind: An evolutionary perspective (pp. 209–243). Oxford University Press.
28. Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18(3), 213 – 231.
29. Goffman, E. (1967). On face-work. In E. Goffman, Interaction ritual: Essays on face-toface behavior (pp. 5–45). Anchor Books.
30. Greimas, A. J. (1983). Structural semantics: An attempt at a method (D. McDowell, R. Schleifer, & A. Velie, Trans.). University of Nebraska Press. (Original work published 1966), 325p.
31. Greimas, A. J. (1983). Structural semantics: An attempt at a method (D. McDowell, R. Schleifer, & A. Velie, Trans.). University of Nebraska Press. (Original work published 1966) “Reflections on Actantial Models” chapter 10. pp. 172–221.
32. Greimas, A. J. (1987). Elements of a narrative grammar. In On meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory (pp. 63–83). translated by Paul J. Perron and Frank H. Collins, University of Minnesota Press, 237 p.
33. Halliday, M. A. K. (1971). Linguistic function and literary style: An inquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors. In S. Chatman (Ed.), Literary style: A symposium (pp. 330–368). Oxford University Press.
34. Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. Edward Arnold, 143 p.
35. Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman. xv, 374 p.
36. Hamon, P. (1991). The expository device: A structural study of description. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 206 p.
37. Harrison, C., Nuttall, L., Stockwell, P., & Yuan, W. (Eds.). (2014). Cognitive grammar in literature. John Benjamins Publishing, 256 p.
38. Hartung, J., & Elpelt, B. B. (1997). Hypertext als Gegenstand linguistischer Forschung [Hypertext as an object of linguistic research]. In G. Antos & H. Tietz (Eds.), Textstrukturen im Medienwandel (Vol. 10, pp. 19–34). Peter Lang.
39. Hickey, L. (Ed.). (1989). The Pragmatics of Style. London: Routledge.207 p.
40. Hjelmslev, L. (1961/1963). Prolegomena to a theory of language (F. J. Whitfield, Trans.; Revised ed.). University of Wisconsin Press. (Original work published 1943) 144 p.
41. Humboldt, W. von. (1999). On language: On the diversity of human language construction and its influence on the mental development of the human species (M. Losonsky, Ed.; P. Heath, Trans.). Cambridge University Press, 296 p.
42. Underhill, J. W. (2009). Humboldt, worldview and language. Edinburgh University Press, 176 p.
43. Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). MIT Press.
44. Jeffries, L. (2010). Critical stylistics: The power of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 216 p.
45. Jeffries, L., & McIntyre, D. (2010). Stylistics. Cambridge University Press, 264 p. Simpson, P. (2014). Stylistics: A resource book for students(2nd ed.). Routledge, 332 p.
46. Jensen, K. E. (2014). Linguistics in the digital humanities: (Computational) corpus linguistics. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 30(57), 117–134.
47. Kristeva, J. (1980). Word, Dialogue and Novel. In L. S. Roudiez (Ed.), T. Gora, A. Jardine, & L. S. Roudiez (Trans.), Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art (pp. 62–91). New York: Columbia University Press
48. Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press, 572 p.
49. Lecercle, J.-J. (1999). Interpretation as Pragmatics. London: Macmillan, 1999, 260 p.
50. Leech, G., & Short, M. (2007). Style in fiction: Alinguistic introduction to English fictional prose (2nd ed.). Pearson Longman, 424 p.
51. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 420 p.
52. Locher, M. A., Jucker, A. H., Landert, D., & Messerli, T. C. (2023). Fiction and pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, 86 p.
53. Lodge, D. (1992). The Art of Fiction. London: Penguin Books, 240 p.
54. Makhachashvili, R. (2022). Digital transformation of linguistics and education in the post-pandemic era. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Humanities (pp. 45–50). Humanities Press.
55. McIntyre, D., & Walker, B. (2019). Corpus stylistics: Theory and practice. Edinburgh University Press, 376 p.
56. Melnychuk О., Bekhta І., Tkachivska M. (2023). Pearson Correlation Coefficient in Studying the Meaning of a Literary Text // Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Systems (COLINS 2023). Volume II: Computational Linguistics Workshop. Kharkiv, Ukraine, April 20-21. 2023, P. 460 – 477.
57. Pilkington, A. (2000). Poetic effects: A relevance theory perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 209 p.
58. Pratt, M. L. (1977). Toward a speech act theory of literary discourse. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 236 p.
59. Predelli, S. (2020). Fictional discourse: A radical fictionalist semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 194 p.
60. Prince, G. (1973). A grammar of stories: An introduction. Mouton,106 p.
61. Prince, G. (1982). Narratology: The form and functioning of narrative. Mouton, 191 p.
62. Prince, G. (1987/2003). A dictionary of narratology. University of Nebraska Press, 118 p / 126 p.
63. Prince, G. (1992). Narrative as theme: Studies in French fiction. University of Nebraska Press, 161 p.
64. Rastier, F. (1997). Meaning and textuality (F. Collins & P. Perron, Trans.). University of Toronto Press, 281 p.
65. Ricoeur, P. (1981). "What is a Text? Explanation and Understanding." In J.B. Thompson (Ed. & Trans.), Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Pp. 145 – 164.
66. Ryan, M.-L. (1991). Possible worlds, artificial intelligence, and narrative theory. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 291 p.
67. Saussure, F. de. (1959). Course in general linguistics (C. Bally & A. Sechehaye, Eds.; W. Baskin, Trans.). Philosophical Library. (Original work published 1916), 240 p.
68. Sell, R. D. (Ed.). (1991). Literary pragmatics. London, England: Routledge, 264 p.
69. Shen D. (2025). Discourse and style. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis, 218 p. Fowler, R. (1986). Linguistic criticism. Oxford University Press, 190 p.
70. Shen D. (2025). Discourse and style. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis. 218 p. Fowler, R. (1986). Linguistic criticism. Oxford University Press, 190 p.
71. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Blackwell, 338 p.
72. Stockwell, P. (2019). Cognitive poetics: An introduction (2nd ed.). London: Routledge, 256 p.
73. Stockwell, P., & Whiteley, S. (Eds.). (2014). The Cambridge handbook of stylistics. Cambridge University Press, 690 p.
74. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 388 p.
75. Toolan, M. (2001). Narrative: A critical linguistic introduction (2nd ed.). London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis, 272 p.
76. Toolan, M. (1998). Language in Literature: An Introduction to Stylistics. London: Arnold, 264 p.
77. Trier, J. (1931). Der deutsche Wortschatz im Sinnbezirk des Verstandes: Von den Anfängen bis zum Beginn des 13. Jahrhunderts. Winter, 347 p.
78. Underhill, J. W. (2009). Humboldt, worldview and language. Edinburgh University Press., 176 p.
79. van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Text and context: Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. Longman, 261 p.
80. Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (J. B. Carroll, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work consists of 278 p.
81. Wittgenstein L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 232 p.
Опубліковано
2026-04-10
Як цитувати
Бехта, І. А. (2026). АНТРОПОЦЕНТРИЧНИЙ ВЕКТОР ДОСЛІДЖЕННЯ МОНОМОДАЛЬНОГО ХУДОЖНЬОГО ТЕКСТУ В ДОБУ ЦИФРОВІЗАЦІЇ. Нова філологія, (101), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.26661/2414-1135-2026-101-5
Розділ
Статті
Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN 
.png)
