ASPECTS OF CONCEPTS ORGANIZATION AS THEORIES OF CATEGORIES SIMILARITY
The present article is devoted to one of the important problems of modern linguistics – language categorization. The proposed semantic-cognitive approach to the description of categories and features of language categorization is relevant in modern science; it is used to fully characterize the presented phenomenon. Within the framework of this theory we consider the following attributive approaches to the organization of categories: classical, prototype, exemplar ones. We present and analyze the principles of organization and construction of different types of categories, taking into account the fact that scientists describe this phenomenon from different points of view and within different linguistic theories: denotativereference; functional-semantic, theory of frame semantics and semantic-cognitive theory of categories. Since language uses a common cognitive apparatus, language categories are represented by categories of the same type as other categories in the conceptual system, for example, they demonstrate prototype effects and basic level effects. One of the presented problems is the connection between the differences that exist in the real world and the differences that are fixed by the means of speech. The existence of categories is possible due to the fact that the basis of their functioning is not the features of a particular language, and a certain model of knowledge. An important factor is the internal organization of the category, which covers the core and periphery. Because cognitive linguistics is a discipline that engages scholars in a variety of fields, modern linguistics introduces new explanations for the organization of knowledge about the world in the speaker’s mind, it is based on cognitive and psychological methods. The cognitive approach to language analysis is to identify and explain the processes of categorization and conceptualization that are reproduced in language. The unit of conceptualization in cognitive linguistics is a notion (concept), which is understood as the result of cognition. The concept, according to cognitive and linguistic-cultural interpretation, concentrates not only the semantics of the language unit, but also some abstract entity. The concept is a unit of mental lexicon; it is a set of values and norms as a result of human cognitive activity.
2. Brooks L. Non-analytic Concept Formation and Memory for Instances. Cognition and Categorisation / ed. by E. Rosch, B. B. Lloyd. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1978. P. 169–211.
3. Conrad C. Cognitive Economy in Semantic Memory. Experimental Psyhology. 1972. P. 148–154.
4. Croft W., Cruse D.A. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2004. 356 p.
5. Embley D. W., Olivé A., Ram S. Conceptual Modeling. 25th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling. Tucson, AZ, USA, 2006. P. 544–547.
6. Erickson M.A., Kruschke, J.K. Rules and Exemplars in Category Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1998. P. 107–140.
7. Estes W. Concepts, Categories and Psychological Science. Psychological Science. 1993. Vol. 4. P. 143–153.
8. Glass A.L., Holyoak K.J. Alternative Conceptions of Semantic Memory. Cognition. 1975. P. 313–339.
9. Goldstone R.L., Kersten A., Carvalho P.F. Concepts and Categorization. Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology / ed. by A.F. Healy, R. W. Proctor. 2nd ed. Vol. 4. 2003. P. 599–621.
10. Hampton J.A. Testing the Prototype Theory of Concepts. Journal of Memory and Language. 1995. P. 686–708.
11. Induction: Processes in Inference, Learning and Discovery / Holland J. H., Holyoak K. J., Nisbett R. E., Thagard P. Cambridge : MIT Press, 1986. 385 p.
12. Jackson, F. From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1998. 174 p.
13. Katz J., Fodor J. The Structure of a Semantic Theory. Language. Vol. 39. 1963. P. 170–210.
14. Kruschke J.K. Models of Categorization. The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology / ed. by R. Sun. 2008. P. 267–301.
15. Lakoff G. Categories and Cognitive Models. Cognitive Science Report. Institure for Cognitive Studies. University of California, Berkley. 1982. Vol. 2.
16. Leech G. Semantics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1974. 386 p.
17. McGarty C., Mavor K.І., Skorich D.P. Social Categorization. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 22 / ed. by J. D. Wright. 2nd ed. 2015. P. 186–191.
18. McNamara T. P., Strenberg R. J. Mental Models of Word Meaning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1983. № 22 (4). P. 449–474.
19. Medin D.L., Smith E.E. Concepts and Concept Formation. Annual Review of Psyhology. 1984. № 35. P. 113–138.
20. Medin D.L., Schaffer M.M. Context Theory of Classification Learning Psychological Review. 1978. № 85 (3). P. 207–238.
21. Mervis C.B., Catlin J., Rosh E. Relationships Among Goodness-of-example, Category Norms, and Word Frequency. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 1976. № 7. P. 283-284.
22. Murphy G.L., Medin D.L. The Role of Theories in Conceptual Coherence Psychological Review. 1985. № 92. P. 289–315.
23. Nosofsky R.M. Tests of an Exemplar Model for Relating Perceptual Classification and Recognition Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1991. № 17. P. 3–27.
24. Peacoke C.A Study of Concepts. Cambridge : MIT Press, 1992. 208 p.
25. Posner M.I., Keele S.W. On the Genesis of Abstract Ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1968. № 77. P. 353–363.
26. Formal Approaches in Categorization / ed. by E. Pothos, A. Wills. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. 348 p.
27. Reed S.K. Pattern Recognition and Categorization. Cognitive Psychology. 1972. № 3. P. 382–407.
28. Rey G. The Unavailability of What We Mean: A Reply to Quine, Fodor and Lepore. Holism: A Consumer Update / ed. by A. Fodor, E. Lepore. Atlanta: Rodopi, 1993. P. 61–101.
29. Rips L.J. Similarity, Typicality and Categorisation. Similarity and Analogical Reasoning / ed. by A. Ortony, S. Vosniadou. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. P. 21–59.
30. Rosch E. Reclaiming Concepts. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 1999. № 6(11-12). P. 61–77.
31. Rosch E., Mervis, C.B. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology. 1975. № 7 (4). P. 573–605.
32. Rosh E. Principles of Categorisation. Cognition and Categorization / ed. by E. Rosh, B.B. Lloyd. Hillsdale : Lawrence Erlbaum, 1978. P. 27–48.
33. Rosh E., Mervis C. B. Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories. Cognitive Psychology. 1975. № 7. P. 573–605.
34. Smith L.B., Samuelson L.K. Perceiving and Remembering: Category Stability, Variability and Development. Knowledge, Concepts and Categories / ed. by K. Lamberts, D. Shanks, 1997. Hove : Psychology Press. P. 161–195.
35. Хилл Т.И. Современные теории познания / перев. Б.Э Быховский. Москва : Прогресс, 1965. 518 с.