ІНТЕРМЕДІАЛЬНІСТЬ ХУДОЖНІХ ФОРМ В СУЧАСНОМУ АНГЛОМОВНОМУ ПОЕТИЧНОМУ ДИСКУРСІ

O. S. Marina

doi:10.26661/2414-1135-2021-83-24

O. S. Marina http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9079-5702

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26661/2414-1135-2021-83-24

Keywords: poetic discourse, artistic forms, artistic image, semiotic mode, intermediality, multimodality, theatricality, musicalization of poetry, visualization of poetry, multimodal construal, anticonceptuality

Abstract

The article focuses on analyzing artistic forms constructed in contemporary Anglophone poetic discourse. Dominant characteristics of the latter are as follows: eclecticism, genre hybridity, interactivity, non-linearity, irrationality, anti-conceptuality, and mobility. An artistic form includes the whole range of elements composing a poetic text. From the standpoint of multimodality, the paper outlines verbal semiotic mode in constructing artistic forms, which includes words, word combinations, verbal and artistic images, as well as composition in general. Depending on poetic discourse genre, these could be printed poetic texts, mobile verbal images in digital environment or texts made of wood or other material and installed in real world locations. Auditory mode embraces sounds and sound repetitions, rhyme, rhythm, intonation, and also melody accompanying a poetic text in digital format. The context of visual mode presupposes visual form of a poetic text, mobile images or still illustrations as poetic text components. Artistic forms are multimodal construals created in contemporary Anglophone transgenre poetic discourse at the intersection and in interaction of verbal, visual, and auditory semiotic modes. The article views intermediality of artistic forms functioning in contemporary Anglophone poetic discourse as interaction of techniques and means from different kinds of art in their creation. In the analyzed discourse it is manifested in the following aspects: musicalization of poetry, visualization of poetry. Artistic forms constructed in such discourse create theatricality effect. The authors of the analyzed texts make some kind of performance by experimenting with poetic form and content, genre hybridization, integration of various semiotic modes and artistic forms.

References

1. Еліот Т.С. Музика поезії. Слово. Знак. Дискурс : антологія світової літературно-критичної думки ХХ ст. Львів : Літопис. 2001. С. 95–109.
2. Маріна О.С. Сучасний англомовний поетичний дискурс: мультимодальний формат. Науковий вісник херсонського державного університету. Серія «Германістика та міжкультурна комунікація». 2019. № 2. С. 48–54.
3. Раренко Н.В. Словесна образність як засіб театралізації англомовної постмодерністської художньої прози. Науковий вісник Міжнародного гуманітарного університету. Серія «Філологія». 2020. № 45. том 2. С. 131–134.
4. Якобсон Р. Лінгвістика і поетика. Слово. Знак. Дискурс : антологія світової літературно-критичної думки ХХ ст. Львів : Літопис. 2001. С. 465–491.
5. Bennett J. URL: http://johnmbennettpoetry.blogspot.com/2021/05/ (дата звернення: 05.08.2021).
6. Dworkin C. The Fate of Echo. Against Expression : An Anthology of Conceptual Writing. Evanston, Illinois : Northwestern University Press. 2011. P. XXIII–LIV.
7. Jenkins H. Transmedia What? Immerse. 2016. URL: https://immerse.news/transmedia-what-15edf6b61daa (дата звернення: 27.07.2021).
8. Jewitt C. An Introduction to Multimodality. The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London : Routledge. 2014. P. 1–9.
9. Kress G. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London : Routledge. 2010. 236 p.
10. Kress G. Multimodal discourse analysis. The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London : Routledge. 2011. P. 1–7.
11. Manuel J.K. Digimodernism: Configuring Literature and Society. 2020. 156 p.
12. Montgomery R. Poems. URL: http://www.robertmontgomery.org/ (дата звернення: 25.07.2021).
13. Multimodality: Disciplinary Thoughts and the Challenge of Diversity [Wildfeuer J., Pflaeging J., Bateman J., Seizov O. & Tseng C-I. eds.]. Berlin : Walter de Gruyter. 2019. 341 p.
14. Rajewsky I.O. Intermediality, Intertextuality, and Remediation: A Literary Perspective on Intermediality. Intermédialités. 2005. P. 43–64.
15. Redling E. The Musicalization of Poetry. Handbook of Intermediality: Literature – Image – Sound – Music. 2015.
16. Storm J.A.J. Metamodernism: The Future of Theory. Chicago : University of Chicago Press. 2021. 328 p.
17. Wolf W. (Inter)mediality and the study of literature. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture. 2011. Vol. 13. No 3. no pag.

INTERMEDIALITY OF ARTISTIC FORMS IN CONTEMPORARY ANGLOPHONE POETIC DISCOURSE

Abstract

References