DECONSTRUCTION OF ARCHETYPES IN THE EROTIC-THANATOLOGICAL SPACE OF POSTMODERNIST NOVELS WRITTEN BY YURII ANDRUKHOVYCH

Keywords: archetype, deconstruction, Éρως and θάνατος dyad, erotic osmosis, erocentrism, orphic-narcissistic complex

Abstract

It is a common knowledge that, in the postmodern era, defined as the era of extinction, love ('Éρως) and death (Θάνατος) lose the status of binary oppositions and become polymorphic correspondences, which, in our opinion, can be most logically perceived and interpreted with the help of deconstruction. After all, in modern philosophy, the text is transmitted as a sign, and accordingly it can be deciphered with the help of certain codes, and interpreted, according to Paul Ricker, “as the work of thinking, which consists in deciphering the meaning behind the obvious content, the meanings encrypted, hidden in the literal meaning” [19, c. 18]. Therefore, the double and multiple coding characteristic of postmodernism provides different possibilities of understanding and interpretation for different subjects, deforms or even eliminates the author’s self, mixes styles, quotations and allusions. Such a text becomes erotocentric, turns into a certain immanent expression of the category of corporeality. Thus, according to Roland Barthes, the direct dependence of the “birth of the reader” (the embodiment of the instinct of creation, identical to 'Éρως) on the “death of the author” (as the embodiment of the instinct of destruction presented by the forces of Θάνατος) is revealed and, thus the reception of the dyad “'Éρως- θάνατος” is actualized as the one that, according to Sigmund Freud and his follower Herbert Marcuse, structures the modern world. In the later manifestations of postmodernism (the end of the ХХ and the beginning of the ХХІ century), which were significantly influenced by deconstructivity theory (in particular, in the interpretation of Jacques Derrida), the fascination with psychoanalysis and archetypal images, which is usual for postmodern aesthetics, also undergoes a certain deconstruction, perceiving and – most importantly – demonstrating somewhat new vision of those concepts or images that became classic in the philosophy of S. Freud, С.-G. Jung and their followers. This study allows us to trace the successive deconstruction of archetypal images and symbols in the novels of the modern Ukrainian writer Yurii Andrukhovych. In particular, we are talking about his works at the turn of the millennium, the text “The Perversion” (1996) and the novel “The Twelve Rings” (2003), which, in our point of view, have been significantly influenced by deconstructivism, especially in the interpretation of the philosophical and cultural dyad “Love-Death” (“Éρως and θάνατος”).

References

1. Андрухович Ю. Дванадцять обручів. Київ : Критика, 2004. 333 с.
2. Андрухович Ю. Орфей хронічний. Критика. 2003. № 9. С. 30–31.
3. Андрухович Ю. Перверзія. Львів : ВНТЛ-Класика, 2004. 304 с.
4. Антонич Б.-І. Велика гармонія: (Модерністична поезія XX ст.) : Для ст. шк. віку / упоряд., передм., прим. Д.В. Павличка. Київ : Веселка, 2003. 350 с.
5. Крістева Ю. Stabat Mater. Слово. Знак. Дискурс : Антологія світової літературно-критичної думки ХХ ст. / за ред. М. Зубрицької. Львів : Літопис, 1996. С. 495–509.
6. Кун Н. Легенди і міфи Стародавньої Греції. Київ : Веселка, 1967. 456 с.
7. Юнг К.Г. AION: Нариси щодо символіки самості. Львів : Астролябія, 2016. 432 с.
8. Юнґ К.Ґ. Архетипи і колективне несвідоме / пер. з німецької К. Котюк ; науковий редактор українського видання О. Фешовець. Львів : Видавництво «Астролябія», 2018. 608 с.
9. Cirlot J.-E. A Dictionary of Symbols. Chicago : Routledge & K. Paul, 1971. 419 p.
10. Derrida J. Aporias US: Stanford University Press, California, 1993. 120 p.
11. Derrida J. Cinders / translated, edited, and with an introduction by Ned Lukacher. Lincoln : University of Nebraska Press, 1991. 77 p.
12. Derrida J. Dissemination / Translated by Barbara Johnson. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1983. 400 p.
13. Derrida J. Margins of philosophy / translated, with additional notes, by Alan Bass. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1982. 330 p.
14. Frye N. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton : University press, 1973. 396 p.
15. Jung C.G. Man and His Symbols. N-Y : Dell Publishing, 1964. 374 p.
16. Jung C.G. The Spirit of Psychology. Spirit and Nature. New York, 1954; London, 1955. P. 371–444.
17. Jung, C.G. Two Essays on Analytical Psychology, Collected Works of C.G. Jung, Volume 7, Princeton, New Jersey : Princeton University Press, 1967. 253 p.
18. Opryshko N. Erotic-osmotic complex as the essence of postmodernism: philosophical aspect. New stages of development of modern science in Ukraine and EU countries: monograph / edited by authors. 6th ed. Riga, Latvia : “Baltija Publishing”, 2019. 472 p. Р. 130–153.
19. Ricoeur P. Le Conflit des Interprétations. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 1971. № 25 (4). P. 631–637.
Published
2023-12-19
How to Cite
Opryshko, N. O. (2023). DECONSTRUCTION OF ARCHETYPES IN THE EROTIC-THANATOLOGICAL SPACE OF POSTMODERNIST NOVELS WRITTEN BY YURII ANDRUKHOVYCH. New Philology, (92), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.26661/2414-1135-2023-92-7
Section
Articles