VERBAL PORTRAYAL OF THE SCORNED WOMAN ARCHETYPE (IN MAINSTREAM CINEMA)
Abstract
The paper focuses on the narrative analysis of the verbal portrayal of eleven female cinematic characters representing the Scorned Woman archetype. The hypothesis of the research is that the characters’ narratives are defined by their archetype. The archetype is a repetitive image of the collective unconscious, as proposed by C. Jung. The present study revises post-Jungian archetype typologies, focusing on the classification by V. Schmidt. Schmidt’s typology is compatible with A. Maslow’s hierarchy of human needs. The Scorned Woman is a villainous antipode of the Matriarch archetype as both are ruled by the same basic needs for love and esteem. Thus, the characters need to form and maintain an alliance with the partner of their choice. Usually, the idea takes the form of matrimony and family; however, the energy might be redirected into creating and ruling some entity (serving as a surrogate family). The need defines her narratives on marriage, family, common future, love, support, home, order, and faithfulness. Unlike the Matriarch’s needs, the Scorned Woman’s aspirations are thwarted, and the characters of the latter archetype feel betrayed, rejected, left, discarded, abandoned, unwanted, and hurt. It defines the Scorned Woman’s narratives on sorrow, loneliness, unrequited love, indifference, contempt, betrayal, retaliation, punishment, revenge, and gloat. To balance the negative feelings, she needs to exercise some kind of control, simulating the semblance of order and structure in her life. She might go to extremities, turning into a tyrant and dictator. She directs her vengeance against different characters, including the man who wronged her. Usually, her actions seem justified as she is represented as a victim of male betrayal, and thus deserves to have her retaliation. Thus, the Scorned Woman is an antagonist (predominantly), or a villain. Possible arc developments for the Scorned woman include 1) forgiveness and matrimony; 2) acceptance and moving on with her life; 3) justified revenge and moving on; 4) unjustified revenge and consequent confrontation; 5) unjustified revenge and death/incapacitation. The outcome depends on the genre, rating, and target group of the film, the character’s role (antagonist or villain), and arc development (negative valence, contamination, or redemption).
References
2. Jung C. G. The archetypes and the collective unconscious (R. Hull, Trans.) (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 1968. 451 p.
3. Hirsh J. B., & Peterson J. B. Personality and language use in self-narratives. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 2009. P. 524–527. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.006
4. Schmidt, V. (2007). The 45 Master characters. Cincinnati, Ohio: Writers Digest Books. 338 p.
5. Bassil-Morozow, H. (2018). Feminist Film Criticism: Towards a Jungian Approach. In The Routledge International Handbook of Jungian Film Studies. Ed. Luke Hockley. London and New York : Routledge. Pp. 115–127.
6. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), pp. 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
7. Faber, M. A., & Mayer, J. D. Resonance to archetypes in media: There's some accounting for taste. Journal of Research in Personality, vol. 43, no. 3, 2009. Pp. 307–322. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.11.003
8. Mark M., & Pearson C. S. The Hero and the Outlaw: Building extraordinary brands through the power of archetypes. New York : McGraw-Hill, 2001. 384 p.
9. Cowden T.D., LaFever C., & Viders S. The Complete Writer’s Guide to Heroes & Heroines: Sixteen Master Archetypes. Pasadena, CA: Archetype Press, 2013. 214 p. 10. Berezhna M.V. The Matriarch Cinematic Archetype: Narrative Analysis. Тези доповідей ХІV Міжнародної наукової конференції «Іно-земна філологія у ХХІ столітті»: Запорізький національний університет. Запоріжжя: ЗНУ, 2022. С. 15–18.
11. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), pp. 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
12. Önal, L. (2011). The discursive suppression of women: Female evils as the villains of the motherhood narrative. Folklore, 48, 85–116. doi: 10.7592/FEJF2011.48.onal
13. Lodi-Smith, J., Geise, A. C., Roberts, B. W., & Robins, R. W. (2009). Narrating personality change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), pp. 679–689. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014611
14. Berezhna M. V. Maleficent: from the Matriarch to the Scorned Woman (Psycholinguistic Image). Scientific and pedagogical internship "Professional training of a modern philologist: the use of European practices in the education system of Ukraine": Internship proceedings, October 25 – December 5, 2021. Częstochowa, Republic of Poland : Baltija Publishing, 2021. P. 11–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31812/123456789/5766
15. Бережна М. В. «Матріарх» і «Зневажена жінка»: два психолінгвістичні архетипи одного кіно- персонажа. Сучасна філологічна наука: акту- альні питання та вектори розвитку : колек- тивна монографія / відп. за випуск М. В. Мамич. Львів – Торунь: Ліга-Прес, 2021. С. 5–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-242-8-1
16. Dundes, L., Buitelaar, M. S., & Streiffi, Z. (2019). Bad Witches: Gender and the Downfall of Elizabeth Holmes of Theranos and Disney's Maleficent. Social Sciences, 8(175), pp. 1–17. doi:10.3390/socsci8060175
17. Black, J. E., Helmy, Y., Robson, O., & Barnes, J. L. (2019). Who can resist a villain? Morality, machiavellianism, imaginative resistance and liking for dark fictional characters. Poetics, 74, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2018.12.005
18. Smith D. The Psychology Workbook for Writers. Tools for Creating Realistic Characters and Conflict in Fiction. Wooden Tiger Press, 2015. 86 p.
19. Eden, A., Oliver, M. B., Tamborini, R., Limperos, A., & Woolley, J. (2015). Perceptions of moral violations and personality traits among heroes and villains. Mass Communication and Society, 18(2), pp. 186-208. doi:10.1080/15205436.2014.923462