FEATURES OF USING PERFORMATIVES WITH ILLOCUTIVE FORCE OF ACCUSATION

  • A.A. Korol
Keywords: performative, illocution, communicative situation, syntactic model, social distance / status between communes

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of performative accusation utterances in modern German fiction discourse. The purpose is to investigate the lexical and syntactic means of expressing performative accusation and pragmatic factors of this communicative situation. The following research methods have been employed in the paper: linguistic observation, pragmatic interpretation, descriptive method, discourse analysis, structural modeling. The accusation utterances, presented in German by a performative formula, which provides a statement with a predicate, expressed by the verbs “beschuldigen (j-n + G.)”, “anklagen (j-n + G.)”, which contain in its lexical semantics the seme “accusation”. The performative formula (S + P (beschuldigen Präs) + Obj.) can appear in various constructions in the hidden performatives, in which the basic meaning of a full verb is modified. Such performatives are implicit in the accusation and are realized with the phrases “j-m die Schuld geben”, “j-m etw. zur Last legen”, “schuld sein (an D.)”, “die Schuld (an etw.) tragen”, the lexical meaning of which directly indicates the accusation of the addressee. There are 5 main syntactic models of performative accusation: S + P (beschuldigen Präs) + Obj.; S + P (sein Präs + schuld).; S + P (sein Präs + schuld ) + NS.; S + P (tragen Präs) + Schuld.; S + P (V Präs / Perf) + durch + (Poss. Pron) Schuld. The following significant pragmatic factors of the communicative situation that influence the choice of language forms of accusation utterances, are identified: symmetrical / asymmetric social status relations between communicators (addressee status higher / lower / equal status); official and business / friendly and familiar social distance and gender factor. The quantitative variability of the use of performative accusation utterances (depending on social status relations and the social distance between communicators) was analyzed and it was found out that the implementation of performative accusation utterances is possible only in a limited communicative situation under certain conditions.

References

1. Бацевич Ф.С. Основи комунікативної лінгвістики. Київ : Академія, 2004. 342 с.
2. Белова А.Д. Лингвистические аспекты аргументации : Лингвистика. Теория коммуникации. Английский язык. 2.-е изд., перераб. и доп. Киев, 2003. 304 с.
3. Богданов В.В. Речевое общение. Прагматические и семантические аспекты : учеб. пособие. Ленинград : Изд-во Ленингр. гос. ун-та, 1990. 88 с.
4. Виноградов В.В. О категории модальности и модальных словах в русском языке. Избранные труды: Исследования по русской грамматике. Москва : Наука, 1975. 560 с.
5. Клочко Л.И. Высказывания похвалы в коммуникативно-деятельностной парадигме общения (на материале английского языка) : дис. канд. філол. наук: 10.02.04 / Сумск. гос. ун-т. Сумы, 2003. 194 с.
6. Austin J.L. How to do things with words. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1962. 168 p.
7. Brandt M., Falkenberg G., Fries N., Liedtke F., Meibauer J., Öhlschlager G., Rehbock H., Rosengren I., Die performativen Äußerungen – eine empirische Studie: Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung. B. 43. H. 3. Berlin, 1990. S. 355–369.
8. Bryant C. Status, Status Group : International Encyclopedia of Sociology (Ed. by Mann M.). N.-Y. : Routledge, 1984. P. 376–377.
9. Frankenberg H. Familienkonflikte und ihre sprachliche Bewältigung: e. Beitr zur pragmalinguist. Therapieforschung. Frankfurt am Main : Haag und Herchen, 1979. 275 S.
10. Wunderlich D. Zur Konventionalität von Sprechhandlungen // Linguistische Pragmatik. Frankfurt am Main : Suhrkamp, 1975. S. 11–58.
Published
2020-12-09
How to Cite
Korol, A. (2020). FEATURES OF USING PERFORMATIVES WITH ILLOCUTIVE FORCE OF ACCUSATION. New Philology, 1(80), 272-278. https://doi.org/10.26661/2414-1135-2020-80-1-40