MECHANISM OF PERCEPTION OF A PUBLIC FIGURE’S CHARISMATIC CHARACTERISTICS BY THE AUDIENCE

Keywords: charismatic personality, verbal-and-graphic model, charisma, charismatic characteristics, communication, mechanism

Abstract

The paper provides rationale for the verbal-and-graphic model of the mechanism of perception of a public figure’s charismatic characteristics by the audience. To fulfill the research aim, the author provides a generalized classification of personal traits of formal and informal charismatic public leaders. In the course of theoretical research, there has arisen the need to form optimal terminological instrumentarium, suitable for a complete comprehensive and conclusive scientific description of the phenomenon of charismatic public figures’ communicative behaviour and the mechanism of perception of a public figure’s charismatic characteristics by the audience. As a result of the analysis of charismatic communication features described by the authors from various areas of science (psychology, sociology, linguistics), the paper provides their division into principal features as well as the means of communicative purpose actualization. In order to create the abovementioned model, personal characteristics of a speaker, audience members and communication conditions, able to influence the perception of charismatic characteristics, have been systematized. To avoid a broad definition of charisma, the author offers their own definition of the phenomenon, serving the purpose of this interdisciplinary research. The article presents a verbal-and-graphic model of the mechanism of perception of a public figure’s charismatic characteristics by the audience, developed on the basis of the Klymenyuk’s pyramid of the person’s spiritual being. The model presents the abovementioned mechanism as an interaction of two systems (a charismatic speaker and a recipient with a certain cultural level) in a specific environment (specific communication conditions). This model substantiates the process of choosing optimal verbal and non-verbal means of communication to exert charismatic influence on a recipient to the maximum extent. The author also outlines prospects of a further use of the model in interdisciplinary research of a leader speaker’s subliminal influence on the audience.

References

1. Калита А., Тараненко Л. Система целей и средств суггестивного воздействия в коммуникации. Вісник Київського національного лінгвістичного університету. Серія «Філологія». 2012. Т. 15. № 2. С. 47–56. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vknlu_fil_2012_15_2_8.
2. Калита А. Энергетика речи : монография. Киев : Кафедра, 2016. 292 с.
3. Клименюк А. Знание, познание, когниция : монография. Тернополь, 2010. 304 с.
4. Клименюк А., Калита А. Энергетическая система и механизмы реализации когнитивных процессов. Вісник Харківського національного університету імені В.Н. Каразіна. Серія «Германістика та міжкультурна комунікація». Харків, 2012. № 1. C. 10–19.
5. Петлюченко Н. Модель харизматичної комунікації у німецькому та українському публічному дискурсі. Наукові праці Національного університету «Одеська юридична академія». 2012. Т. 12. С. 392–401. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nponyua_2012_12_41.
6. Петлюченко Н. Харизматика : мовна особистість і дискурс : монографія. Одеса : Астропринт, 2009. 464 с
7. Стернин И. Введение в речевое воздействие. Воронеж, 2001. 266 с.
8. Тараненко Л. Пирамида Клименюка – универсальный методологический инструментарий когнитивистики. Актуальні питання іноземної філології : науковий журнал. Луцьк : Східноєвроп. нац. ун-т ім. Лесі Українки, 2019. № 11. С. 123–131.
9. Adair-Toteff C. Charisma, Social Aspects of. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences / ed. J.D. Wright. Second Edition. Elsevier, 2015. P. 353–357.
10. Antonakis J., Fenley M., Liechti S. Learning charisma. Transform yourself into the person others want to follow. Harvard Business Review. 2012. Vol. 90 (6). P. 127–147.
11. Awamleh R. Towards A Model of Charismatic Non-Verbal Impression Management. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER). 2011. Vol 2. № 7. P. 27–38.
12. Bensman J., Givant M. Charisma and Modernity: The Use and Abuse of a Concept. Social Research. 1975. Vol. 42 (4). P. 570–614.
13. Conger J. Charismatic and transformational leadership in organizations: An insider’s perspective on these developing streams of research. Leadership Quarterly. 1999. Vol. 10. P. 145–179.
14. De Vries R., Bakker-Pieper A., Oostenveld W. Leadership = Communication? The Relations of Leaders’ Communication Styles with Leadership Styles, Knowledge Sharing and Leadership Outcomes. Journal of business and psychology. 2010. Vol. 25. P. 367–380.
15. The Perception of Charisma from Voice: A Cross-Cultural Study / F. D’Errico et al. Proceedings – 2013 : Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction. ACII. 2013. P. 552–557.
16. Fabbi P. The effects of charismatic communication training on leader communication effectiveness. Doctoral dissertation / Olivet Nazarene University, 2013. 162 p.
17. Fragouli E. The dark-side of charisma and charismatic leadership. The Business and Management Review. 2018. Vol. 9. № 4. P. 298–307.
18. Gutnyk A., Niebuhr O., Gu W. Speaker Charisma Analyzed through the Cultural Lens. In 2021 12’th International Symposium on Chinese Spoken Language Processing (ISCSLP) IEEE. 2021. URL: https://findresearcher.sdu.dk:8443/ws/files/182043942/ASpeaker_charisma_analyzed_through_the_cultural_lens.pdf (дата звернення: 03.10.2021).
19. A follower-centric perspective on charismatic leadership: An integrative review and agenda for future research / J. Harrison et al. Routledge International Handbook of Charisma. 2020. URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03086811/document (дата звернення: 03.10.2021).
20. Heracleous L., Klaering L.A. Charismatic Leadership and Rhetorical Competence: An Analysis of Steve Jobs’s Rhetoric. Group & Organization Management. 2014. Vol. 39. P. 131–161.
21. Influence of age, gender and sample duration on the charisma assessment of German speakers / O. Jokisch et al. In Studientexte zur Sprachkommunikation: Elektronische Sprachsignalverarbeitung. P. 224–231. URL: http://www.essv.de/pdf/2018_224_231.pdf (дата звернення: 03.10.2021).
22. Klein K.J., House R.J. On fire: Charismatic leadership and levels of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly. 1995. Vol. 6 (2). P. 183–198.
23. Louekari L. Charismatic communication style in knowledge-intensive organizations. Master’s thesis / Aalto University. School of Business, 2015. 60 p.
24. Riggio R., Riggio H. Social Psychology and Charismatic Leadership. Leadership at the crossroads: Social psychology and Leadership / Ed. D.R. Forsyth, C. Hoyt, G. Goethals. Praeger, 2008. P. 30–44.
25. Sandberg Y., Moreman C.M. Common Threads among Different Forms of Charismatic Leadership. Journal of Religion and Business Ethics. 2015. Vol. 3. Art.19. URL: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jrbe/vol3/iss1/19.
26. Tan H.H., Wee G. The Role of Rhetoric Content in Charismatic Leadership: A Content Analysis of a Singaporean Leader’s Speeches. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior. 2002. Vol. 5 (3/4). P. 317–342.
27. Towler A.J. Effects of charismatic influence training on attitudes, behavior, and performance. Personnel Psychology. 2003. Vol. 56 (2). P. 363–381.
28. Tucker R.C. Personality and Political Leadership. Political Science Quarterly. 1977. Vol. 92 (3). P. 383–393.
Published
2021-12-30
How to Cite
Boichenko, M. K. (2021). MECHANISM OF PERCEPTION OF A PUBLIC FIGURE’S CHARISMATIC CHARACTERISTICS BY THE AUDIENCE. New Philology, (84), 20-31. https://doi.org/10.26661/2414-1135-2021-84-3
Section
Articles