ТЕЛЕОЛОГІЧНІ РЕФЛЕКСІЙНІ КОНСТИТУЕНТИ СМИСЛУ В АНГЛОМОВНОМУ ПОЛІТИЧНОМУ ДИСКУРСІ
Ключові слова:
телос, моральна телеологія, евристика, рефлексійне судження, рефлексійний смисл
Анотація
Стаття присвячена ціннісно-цільовому аналізу лінгвістичної репрезентації телеологічної рефлексії у сучасному англомовному політичному дискурсі. Поняттєвий і термінологічний апарат телеології як науки про доцільну діяльність у цьому дослідженні застосовано з урахуванням утилітаристських поглядів на мету як критерій моральної оцінки певної події або вчинку. Актуальність розвідки зумовлена потребою виявлення причинно-цільових та лінгвістичних закономірностей актуалізації телеологічних рефлексійних конституентів смислу висловлення у політичному дискурсі. Дослідження виконане на основі науково-методологічних принципів моральної телеології та утилітаризму. Як гіпотезу висунуто тезу про невіддільність телеологічної рефлексії від процесів смислоутворення у політичному дискурсі. У моральній телеології телеологічна рефлексія і телеологічне рефлексійне судження слугують засобами споглядання, самоспоглядання, оцінки і самооцінки щодо моральної і етичної виправданості доцільної дії або події. Евристичну природу смислопродукування відображає введене новітнє поняття «телеологічний рефлексійний смисл». В англомовному політичному дискурсі телеологічні рефлексійні конституенти смислу висловлення здобувають актуалізацію у вигляді телеологічних пояснень, телеологічних дескрипцій та доданого адресатом телеологічного рефлексійного смислу. Розробка і введення у науковий обіг поняття телеологічного рефлексійного смислу узгоджені з композиційною теорією смислу у сучасній семантиці і прагматиці, котра припускає інтуїтивне приписування пропозиції висловлення умов та значень істинності. Теоретичним підґрунтям для введення зазначеного поняття послугувала також теорія поглибленого витлумачення висловлення (deep interpretation) у психології та психолінгвістиці.
Посилання
1. Alexander, V. N. (2009) The Poetics of Purpose. Biosemiotics. № 2. Pp. 77–100.
2. Aristotle. (1998) The Metaphysics. Revised ed. / Trans. by Hugh Lawson-Tancred. London: Penguin Books Ltd. 528 p.
3. Austin, J.L. (2013) Performative Utterances. The Philosophy of Language. International Sixth Edition. / A.P. Martinich and David Sosa (eds.). New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 291–300.
4. Auxter, T. (1982) Kant’s Moral Teleology. Macon, Ga.: Mercer University Press. 193 pp. Synopsis. Retrieved from: https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Kant_s_Moral_Teleology.html?id=d-bWAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y.
5. Ball, D., Rabern, B. (2020) Introduction to the Science of Meaning. The Science of Meaning. Essays on the Metatheory of Natural Language Semantics. / Derek Ball and Brian Rabern (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 1–45.
6. BBC News. 2023. 24 October. Retrieved from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-67201107.
7. Borg, E. (2005. Saying What You Mean: Unarticulated Constituents and Communication. Ellipsis and Non-sentential Speech. Dordrecht: Springer. Pp. 237–262.
8. Borg, E. (2006) Review: Literal Meaning. Francoise Recanati. Mind. Vol. 115. №. 458. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 461–465.
9. Borg, E. (2008) Intention Based Semantics. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. / E. Lepore, B.C. Smith (eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Pp. 250–266.
10 Brentari, C. (2020) Ernst Cassirer’s Reading of Jakob von Uexküll. Between Natural Teleology and Anthropology. Jakob von Uexküll and Philosophy. Life, Environments, Anthropology. / F. Michelini and K. Köchy (eds.). Routledge. Pp. 106–121.
11. Chandler, D. (2007) Semiotics: The Basics. Oxford: Routledge. 307 pp.
12. Chandler, D., Munday, R. (2020) Reflection Theory. A Dictionary of Media and Communication. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 410.
13. Coady, C.A.J. (2007) Dirty Hands. A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. / Robert E. Goodin, Philip Pettit, Thomas Pogge (eds.). 2nd ed. Vol 2. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Pp. 532–540.
14. Crane, T. (1995) Representation. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. / T. Honderich (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 769–770.
15. Daly, C. (2013) Philosophy of Language. An Introduction. London, New Delhi, New York, Sydney: Bloomsbery. 340 pp.
16. Encyclopedia Britannica. (2024) Teleology. Retrieved from: https://www.britannica.com/topic/teleology.
17. Falcon, A. (2023) Aristotle on Causality. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. / Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman (eds.). Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/aristotle-causality/.
18. Forbes, G. (1994) Modern Logic. A Text in Elementary Symbolic Logic. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 397 p.
19. Global Impact of the War in Ukraine: Billions of People Face the Greatest Cost-of-Living Crisis in a Generation. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. 1 June 2022. Retrieved from: https://unctad.org/webflyer/global-impact-war-ukraine-billions-people-face-greatest-cost-living-crisis-generation.
20. Hauser, G.A. (1991) Introduction to Rhetorical Theory. Prospect Heights, Illinois: Waveland Press, Inc., University of Colorado. 210 pp.
21. Horgan, T., Timmons, M. (1999) Troubles for New Wave Moral Semantics: the ‘Open Question Argument’ Revived. Philosophical Papers. Vol. XXI. №. 3. Memphis, Tennessee: Memphis State University, pp. 153–175.
22. Jaszczolt, K.M. (2005) Default Semantics: Foundations of a Compositional Theory of Acts of Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 300 p.
23. Jaszczolt, K. (2009) Pragmatic Compositionality, Syntactic Direction Principle, and the Contextualism/Minimalism Debate. Meaning, Content and Argument. / J.M. Larrazabal and L. Zubeldia (eds.). Bilbao: University of the Basque Country Press. Pp. 347–364.
24. Jaszczolt, K. (2010) Situated Temporal Reference: A Case for Compositional Pragmatics? Journal of Pragmatics. №. 42. Pp. 2898–2909.
25. Jaszczolt, K.M. (2012) Propositional Attitude Reports: Pragmatic Aspects. The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 305–328.
26. Jaszczolt, K.M. (2023) Semantics, Pragmatics, Philosophy: A Journey through Meaning. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press. 438 p.
27. Kant, I. (1987) Critique of Judgment. / Trans. by Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company. 575 p.
28. Kant, I. (1998) The Groundwork of The Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 120 p.
29. Locke, J. (1975) An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. / Peter H. Nidditch (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. 867 p.
30. Matthen, M. (2009) Teleology in Living Things. A Companion to Aristotle. / Georgios Anagnostopoulos (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Pp. 335–347.
31. Matthews, P.H. (2014) The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 443 p.
32. Moore, G.E. (2017) Principia Ethica. New York: SophiaOmni Press. 188 p.
33. Neiman, S. (2024) Why the World Still Needs Immanuel Kant. The New York Times. 2024. 17 April. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/17/arts/immanuel-kant-300-nniversary.html.
34. Ogden, C.K., Richards, I.A. (1989) The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language Upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism. Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. 396 p.
35. Peirce, C.S. (1992) The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings. Vol. 1 (1867–1893). Bloomington; Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. 448 p.
36. Pietroski, P.M. (2018) Conjoining Meanings. Semantics Without Truth Values. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 404 p.
37. Rachlin, H. (2021) Teleological Behaviorism: Origins and Present Status. Contemporary Behaviorisms in Debate. / Zilio, D., Carrara, K. (eds.). Springer, Cham. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77395-3_1.
38. Recanati, F. (2003) Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 235 p.
39. Recanati, F. (2005) Literalism and Contextualism: Some Varieties. Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth. / G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Pp. 171–196.
40. Ruse, M. (2004) Darwin and Design: Does Evolution Have a Purpose? Cambridge: Harward University Press, 2004. 371 p.
41. Russell, B. (1983) Locke’s Theory of Knowledge. History of Western Philosophy. Boston, Sydney, London: George Allen & Unwin. Pp. 584–595.
42. Shakespeare, W. King Lear, Act 1, Scene 1. Retrieved from: https://www.allgreatquotes.com/king-lear-quotes-34/.
43. Shevchenko, O.I. (2014) Lingual Expression of Teleological Aspects of Meaning in English Publicistic Discourse. Scientific Letters of Academic Society of Michal Baludansky. Kosice. Vol. 2, № 1, pp. 133–136.
44. Silk, A. (2017) Metaethical Contextualism. The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. 1st Edition. Routledge, New York. Pp. 102–118.
45. Stalnaker, R.C. (2014) Context and Content. Essays on Intentionality in Speech and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 248 p.
46. Stasimioti, M. (2024) Do Linguistics Still Matter in the Age of Large Language Models? Natural Language Processing. Retrieved from: https://slator.com/do-linguistics-still-matter-in-theage-of-large-language-models/.
47. Szabó, Z.G. (2000) Compositionality as Supervenience. Linguistics and Philosophy. № 23, pp. 475–505.
48. Thames, R.H. (2021) Devices and Desires: Concerning Kenneth Burke’s The War of Words. The Journal of the Kenneth Burke Society. Volume 15, Number 1. Retrieved from: https://kbjournal.org/thames-devices-desires.
49. The Daily Mail. 2022. 27 July.
50. The Daily Mail. 2023. 20 October.
51. The Financial Times. 2023. 23 June.
52. The Guardian. 2016. 4 September.
53. The Holy Bible. (2011). New International Version. Biblica. London: Hodder & Sloughton, 1262 pp.
54. The New York Times. 2024. 17 April. 55. The Oxford Companion to the English Language. / Tom McArthur (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1992. 1184 p.
56. The United Nations. (2022). Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/net-zerocoalition.
57. The Washington Post. 2016. 23 September.
58. Thompson, M. (2016) Enough Said: What’s Gone Wrong with the Language of Politics? London: Vintage Books. 418 p.
59. Tomalin, B. (2017) Enough Said: What’s Gone Wrong with the Language of Politics? Review. Training, Language and Culture, 1(3), pp.110–114.
60. Uexkull, J. von. (2010) A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans: With a Theory of Meaning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 248 p.
61. Unnsteinsson, E. (2014) Compositionality and Sandbag Semantics. Synthese. №. 191(14). Pp. 3329–3350. doi: 10.1007/s11229-014-0449-7.
62. Wang, M. (2020) Linguistic Semiotics. Peking University Linguistics Research. Singapore: Springer. 397 p.
63. Woodfield, A. (2010) Teleology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 232 p.
64. Woolhouse, R. (1994) Locke’s Theory of Knowledge. The Cambridge Companion to Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 146–171.
2. Aristotle. (1998) The Metaphysics. Revised ed. / Trans. by Hugh Lawson-Tancred. London: Penguin Books Ltd. 528 p.
3. Austin, J.L. (2013) Performative Utterances. The Philosophy of Language. International Sixth Edition. / A.P. Martinich and David Sosa (eds.). New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 291–300.
4. Auxter, T. (1982) Kant’s Moral Teleology. Macon, Ga.: Mercer University Press. 193 pp. Synopsis. Retrieved from: https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Kant_s_Moral_Teleology.html?id=d-bWAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y.
5. Ball, D., Rabern, B. (2020) Introduction to the Science of Meaning. The Science of Meaning. Essays on the Metatheory of Natural Language Semantics. / Derek Ball and Brian Rabern (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 1–45.
6. BBC News. 2023. 24 October. Retrieved from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-67201107.
7. Borg, E. (2005. Saying What You Mean: Unarticulated Constituents and Communication. Ellipsis and Non-sentential Speech. Dordrecht: Springer. Pp. 237–262.
8. Borg, E. (2006) Review: Literal Meaning. Francoise Recanati. Mind. Vol. 115. №. 458. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 461–465.
9. Borg, E. (2008) Intention Based Semantics. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. / E. Lepore, B.C. Smith (eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Pp. 250–266.
10 Brentari, C. (2020) Ernst Cassirer’s Reading of Jakob von Uexküll. Between Natural Teleology and Anthropology. Jakob von Uexküll and Philosophy. Life, Environments, Anthropology. / F. Michelini and K. Köchy (eds.). Routledge. Pp. 106–121.
11. Chandler, D. (2007) Semiotics: The Basics. Oxford: Routledge. 307 pp.
12. Chandler, D., Munday, R. (2020) Reflection Theory. A Dictionary of Media and Communication. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 410.
13. Coady, C.A.J. (2007) Dirty Hands. A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. / Robert E. Goodin, Philip Pettit, Thomas Pogge (eds.). 2nd ed. Vol 2. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Pp. 532–540.
14. Crane, T. (1995) Representation. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. / T. Honderich (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 769–770.
15. Daly, C. (2013) Philosophy of Language. An Introduction. London, New Delhi, New York, Sydney: Bloomsbery. 340 pp.
16. Encyclopedia Britannica. (2024) Teleology. Retrieved from: https://www.britannica.com/topic/teleology.
17. Falcon, A. (2023) Aristotle on Causality. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. / Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman (eds.). Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/aristotle-causality/.
18. Forbes, G. (1994) Modern Logic. A Text in Elementary Symbolic Logic. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 397 p.
19. Global Impact of the War in Ukraine: Billions of People Face the Greatest Cost-of-Living Crisis in a Generation. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. 1 June 2022. Retrieved from: https://unctad.org/webflyer/global-impact-war-ukraine-billions-people-face-greatest-cost-living-crisis-generation.
20. Hauser, G.A. (1991) Introduction to Rhetorical Theory. Prospect Heights, Illinois: Waveland Press, Inc., University of Colorado. 210 pp.
21. Horgan, T., Timmons, M. (1999) Troubles for New Wave Moral Semantics: the ‘Open Question Argument’ Revived. Philosophical Papers. Vol. XXI. №. 3. Memphis, Tennessee: Memphis State University, pp. 153–175.
22. Jaszczolt, K.M. (2005) Default Semantics: Foundations of a Compositional Theory of Acts of Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 300 p.
23. Jaszczolt, K. (2009) Pragmatic Compositionality, Syntactic Direction Principle, and the Contextualism/Minimalism Debate. Meaning, Content and Argument. / J.M. Larrazabal and L. Zubeldia (eds.). Bilbao: University of the Basque Country Press. Pp. 347–364.
24. Jaszczolt, K. (2010) Situated Temporal Reference: A Case for Compositional Pragmatics? Journal of Pragmatics. №. 42. Pp. 2898–2909.
25. Jaszczolt, K.M. (2012) Propositional Attitude Reports: Pragmatic Aspects. The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 305–328.
26. Jaszczolt, K.M. (2023) Semantics, Pragmatics, Philosophy: A Journey through Meaning. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press. 438 p.
27. Kant, I. (1987) Critique of Judgment. / Trans. by Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company. 575 p.
28. Kant, I. (1998) The Groundwork of The Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 120 p.
29. Locke, J. (1975) An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. / Peter H. Nidditch (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. 867 p.
30. Matthen, M. (2009) Teleology in Living Things. A Companion to Aristotle. / Georgios Anagnostopoulos (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Pp. 335–347.
31. Matthews, P.H. (2014) The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 443 p.
32. Moore, G.E. (2017) Principia Ethica. New York: SophiaOmni Press. 188 p.
33. Neiman, S. (2024) Why the World Still Needs Immanuel Kant. The New York Times. 2024. 17 April. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/17/arts/immanuel-kant-300-nniversary.html.
34. Ogden, C.K., Richards, I.A. (1989) The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language Upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism. Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. 396 p.
35. Peirce, C.S. (1992) The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings. Vol. 1 (1867–1893). Bloomington; Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. 448 p.
36. Pietroski, P.M. (2018) Conjoining Meanings. Semantics Without Truth Values. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 404 p.
37. Rachlin, H. (2021) Teleological Behaviorism: Origins and Present Status. Contemporary Behaviorisms in Debate. / Zilio, D., Carrara, K. (eds.). Springer, Cham. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77395-3_1.
38. Recanati, F. (2003) Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 235 p.
39. Recanati, F. (2005) Literalism and Contextualism: Some Varieties. Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth. / G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Pp. 171–196.
40. Ruse, M. (2004) Darwin and Design: Does Evolution Have a Purpose? Cambridge: Harward University Press, 2004. 371 p.
41. Russell, B. (1983) Locke’s Theory of Knowledge. History of Western Philosophy. Boston, Sydney, London: George Allen & Unwin. Pp. 584–595.
42. Shakespeare, W. King Lear, Act 1, Scene 1. Retrieved from: https://www.allgreatquotes.com/king-lear-quotes-34/.
43. Shevchenko, O.I. (2014) Lingual Expression of Teleological Aspects of Meaning in English Publicistic Discourse. Scientific Letters of Academic Society of Michal Baludansky. Kosice. Vol. 2, № 1, pp. 133–136.
44. Silk, A. (2017) Metaethical Contextualism. The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. 1st Edition. Routledge, New York. Pp. 102–118.
45. Stalnaker, R.C. (2014) Context and Content. Essays on Intentionality in Speech and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 248 p.
46. Stasimioti, M. (2024) Do Linguistics Still Matter in the Age of Large Language Models? Natural Language Processing. Retrieved from: https://slator.com/do-linguistics-still-matter-in-theage-of-large-language-models/.
47. Szabó, Z.G. (2000) Compositionality as Supervenience. Linguistics and Philosophy. № 23, pp. 475–505.
48. Thames, R.H. (2021) Devices and Desires: Concerning Kenneth Burke’s The War of Words. The Journal of the Kenneth Burke Society. Volume 15, Number 1. Retrieved from: https://kbjournal.org/thames-devices-desires.
49. The Daily Mail. 2022. 27 July.
50. The Daily Mail. 2023. 20 October.
51. The Financial Times. 2023. 23 June.
52. The Guardian. 2016. 4 September.
53. The Holy Bible. (2011). New International Version. Biblica. London: Hodder & Sloughton, 1262 pp.
54. The New York Times. 2024. 17 April. 55. The Oxford Companion to the English Language. / Tom McArthur (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1992. 1184 p.
56. The United Nations. (2022). Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/net-zerocoalition.
57. The Washington Post. 2016. 23 September.
58. Thompson, M. (2016) Enough Said: What’s Gone Wrong with the Language of Politics? London: Vintage Books. 418 p.
59. Tomalin, B. (2017) Enough Said: What’s Gone Wrong with the Language of Politics? Review. Training, Language and Culture, 1(3), pp.110–114.
60. Uexkull, J. von. (2010) A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans: With a Theory of Meaning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 248 p.
61. Unnsteinsson, E. (2014) Compositionality and Sandbag Semantics. Synthese. №. 191(14). Pp. 3329–3350. doi: 10.1007/s11229-014-0449-7.
62. Wang, M. (2020) Linguistic Semiotics. Peking University Linguistics Research. Singapore: Springer. 397 p.
63. Woodfield, A. (2010) Teleology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 232 p.
64. Woolhouse, R. (1994) Locke’s Theory of Knowledge. The Cambridge Companion to Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 146–171.
Опубліковано
2024-10-21
Як цитувати
Шевченко, О. І. (2024). ТЕЛЕОЛОГІЧНІ РЕФЛЕКСІЙНІ КОНСТИТУЕНТИ СМИСЛУ В АНГЛОМОВНОМУ ПОЛІТИЧНОМУ ДИСКУРСІ. Нова філологія, (95), 79-89. https://doi.org/10.26661/2414-1135-2024-95-11
Розділ
Статті
ISSN 
.png)
