THE TERM “NEWS MANAGEMENT” AS THE PECULIARITY OF THE ENGLISH POLITICAL DISCOURSE

  • L. V. MOSIYEVYCH
Keywords: euphemisms, dysphemisms, functions, manipulation, “News Management”, political discourse

Abstract

The article examines the phenomenon “News Management” and its functions in the English political discourse. The English political texts are distinguished by a great number of euphemisms which create some false reality due to the effect of blurring, ambiguity. These lexical units can influence the formation process of worldview of a great number of people. They can also deceive and neutralize the critical mind of a person. The euphemisms are the ideal means for manipulation of people because they hide the real essence of the matter due to creation of neutral or positive connotation. The euphemism is a tool for political participants to hide scandals, disguise the truth, guide public thoughts when discussing social issues or events. With the help of political euphemisms the level of negative valuation becomes smaller, hence one can speak about the complete change of pragmatic focus. The high level of euphemistic frequency in the English texts demonstrates the pragmatic intention to depict the negative objects of politics as neutral or sometimes even positive. On the contrary the subjects of politics are introduced in a dysphemistic way. Dysphemisms, then, are used in talking about one’s opponents, things one wishes to show disapproval of, and things one wishes to be seen to downgrade, to obfuscate or offend. Dysphemisms perform pejorative and discreditable functions through the cognitive mechanism of highlighting. The term “news management” as a result of such manipulations seems to be relevant: the suppression of information (for military or political purposes).

References

1. Болинджер Д. Истина – проблема лингвистическая / Д. Болинджер // Язык и моделирование социального взаимодействия : Переводы / сост. В. М. Сергеева и П. Б. Паршина; Обш. ред. В. В. Петрова. – М. : Прогресс, 1987. – С. 23-43.
2. Бредемайер К. Черная риторика. Власть и магия слова : пер. с нем. / К. Бредемайер. – Москва : Альпина Бизнес Букс, 2007. – 184 с.
3. Мегентесов С. А. Лингвистические аспекты психического воздействия и приемов манипуляции / С. А. Мегентесов, И. Мохамад. - Краснодар, 1997. – 111 с.
4. Москвин В. П. Эвфемизмы : системные связи, функции и способы образования / В. П. Москвин // Вопросы языкознания. – 2001. – № 3, С. 58-67.
5. Паренти М. Демократия для немногих / М. Паренти. – М. : Прогресс, 1990. – 502 с.
6. Allan K., Burridge K. Euphemism, dysphemism cross-varietal synonymy. – [Electronic resource]. – Mode of access : http://arrow.latrobe.edu
7. Bolinger D. Language – the Loaded Weapon. The use and Abuse of the Language Today / D. Bolinger. – London, 1980. – 214 p.
8. Chilton P. Discourse and Politics / P. Chilton, Ch. Shaffner // Discourse Studies : A multidisciplinary Introduction. Volume 2 / еd. by T. van Dijk. – SAGA Publications, London, 1998. – P. 206-230.
9. Ekström M. Politicians interviewed on television news // Discourse & Society. – 2001. – 12 (5). – P. 563-584.
10. Fetzer A. Political Discourse in the media : cross-cultural perspectives. – Amsterdam : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2007.
11. Holder R. W. Dictionary of euphemisms / R. W. Holder. – Oxford University Press, 2008. – 412 p.
12. Lawrence J. Unmentionables and other euphemisms / J. Lawrence. – London : Gentry Books, 1973. – 84 p.
13. McMillan English Dictionary. New Edition. – Oxford : McMillan Education, 2008. – 1745 p.
Published
2017-02-28
How to Cite
MOSIYEVYCH, L. V. (2017). THE TERM “NEWS MANAGEMENT” AS THE PECULIARITY OF THE ENGLISH POLITICAL DISCOURSE. New Philology, (69), 128-133. Retrieved from http://novafilolohiia.zp.ua/index.php/new-philology/article/view/293
Section
Articles