SEMIOTIC POTENTIAL OF SUPRASEGMENTAL COMPONENTS OF LANGUAGE: TONAL VARIATION

  • T. O. KOZLOVA
Keywords: suprasegmental (prosodic) level of language, tone, tone language, semiotic potential, iconicity

Abstract

The article addresses the issues of multimodal linguistics and deals with tones, the suprasegmental elements of language. Using examples from a few genetically unrelated and geographically distant tone languages, particularly Chinese and African languages, it examines the semiotic potential of tonal variation. It is argued that a wide range of lexical and grammatical meanings differentiated by tones have a common cognitive ground and function as tonal icons to encode binary oppositions relating size (‘big – small’, ‘wide – narrow’), temperature (‘hot- cold’), interactions and social relations (‘ask – answer’, ‘teacher – student’, ‘buy – sell’), temporal relations (‘past – present’), subjective attitudes and opinions (‘imperative – desirable’), etc. Being an important typological feature, tone marks various language (lexical and grammatical) and cognitive categories, such as dimensionality, multiplicity, tense, modality, negation. The fact that some of these categories, such as negation, do not find their match in reality provides a good evidence of a great interpretative function of tones. It is discovered that by tonal prosodic variation it is possible to encode both inherent, systemic and functional features of entities as they are cognized by sign-makers. It is noteworthy that lexical oppositions expressed by tone contour variation prevail, whereas tonal marking of grammatical oppositions is rarissimum. Lexical oppositions exploit certain tone variations (or vocalisations) which may be explained by the selectivity of speakers about the means of information encoding. In spite of a great range of encoded meanings, tonal variations have a common cognitive ground and embody binary but opposite concepts involving mutually exclusive, incommensurate, and compatible traits in objects, processes and other phenomena. Tonal colourings appear contrasting to mirror binary oppositions relevant to a limited scope of vocabulary. That is why tonal variations should be considered iconic signs as they are involved into signification processes when sign-makers prefer to mimetically represent the opposition in the signified by opposing the signifiers. In cognitive terms, due to cognisers’ strive for the conformity between cognitive and language structures, conceptually opposed entities are mirrored in language / speech oppositions.

References

1. Гобова Є. В. Контекстні зміни тонів у китайській мові. Сходнознавство. 2012. No 60. C. 3–11. URL : http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Skhodoz_2012_60_3
2. Кибрик А. А. Мультимодальная лингвистика. Когнитивные исследования. 2010. URL : https://ilingran.ru/kibrik/Multimodal@Cog_Studies_2010.pdf
3. Логический анализ языка. Семантика начала и конца. Под ред. Н. Д. Арутюновой. Москва : Индрик, 2002. 648 с.
4. Мацумото Д. Психология и культура. СПб. : Прайм-Еврознак, 2002. 416 с.
5. Никитин М. В. Курс лингвистической семантики : учебное пособие. 2-е изд., доп. и испр. СПб. : Изд-во РГПУ им. А. И. Герцена, 2007. 819 с.
6. Сепир Э. Избранные труды по языкознанию и культурологии. Пер. с англ.; общ. ред. и вступ. ст. А. Е. Кибрика. 2е изд. М. : Прогресс, 2002. 656 с.
7. Торчинов Ε. Α. Даосизм. “Дао-Дэ цзин”. 2-е изд. СПб. : “Азбука-классика”; “Петербургское Востоковедение”, 2004. 256 с.
8. Baxter W. H., Sagart L. Baxter-Sagart Old Chinese reconstruction. Version 1.1. 2014. URL : http://ocbaxtersagart.lsait.lsa.umich.edu/BaxterSagartOCbyMandarinMC2014-09-20.pdf
9. Dryer M. S. Coding of Nominal Plurality. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Ed. by Matthew D. S. Haspelmath Martin. Leipzig : Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. 2013. URL : http://wals.info/chapter/33
10. Dummit N. Chinese Through Tone and Colour. New York : Hippocrene Books, 2008. 244 p.
11. Gallo C. G., Jaeger T. F., Allen J., Swift M. Production in a multimodal corpus : How speakers communicate complex actions. Materials of the Language Resources and Evaluation. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2008 (Marrakech, May 2008). European Language Resources Association, 2018. P. 2917–2920.
12. Hansen Ch. A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought : A Philosophical Interpretation. Oxford, New York : Oxford University Press, 1992. 464 p.
13. Hu Z. Imagic Iconicity in the Chinese Language. Semblance and Signification. Еd. by P. Michelucci, O. Fischer, C. Ljungberg. Amsterdam, Philadelphia : John Benjamins, 2011. P. 83–100.
14. Huffman R. Nuer-English dictionary. Berlin : Dietrech Reimer, 1929. 63 p. URL : https://archive.org/details/nuerenglishdicti00huffuoft
15. Jakobson R., Waugh L. R. The Sound Shape of Language. Berlin, New York : Walter de Gruyter, 2002. 335 p.
16. Lieber R. Substitution of Segments and Features. Morphologie / Morphology. 1. Halbband. Ed. by Geert E. Booij, Christian Lehmann, Joachim Mugdan. Berlin, New York : Walter de Gruyter, 2000. P. 567–576.
17. Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance. Ed. by S. Fischer, Ch. Gabriel. Berlin, New York : Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2016. 701 p.
18. Massaro Dr., Dominic W. Multimodal Speech Perception : A Paradigm for Speech Science. Multimodality in Language and Speech Systems. Ed. by Granström B., House D., Karlsson I. Norwell : Kluwer. 2002. P. 45-71.
19. Miestamo M. Negatives without Negators. Rethinking Universals : How Rarities Affect Linguistic Theory. Ed. by Wohlgemuth J., Cysouw M. Berlin, New York : Walter de Gruyter, 2010. P. 169–194.
20. Ross E.D. Affective Prosody and the Aprosodias. Principles of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology. Ed. by Mesulam M. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2000. P. 316–331.
Published
2019-10-29
How to Cite
KOZLOVA, T. O. (2019). SEMIOTIC POTENTIAL OF SUPRASEGMENTAL COMPONENTS OF LANGUAGE: TONAL VARIATION. New Philology, (77), 26-30. Retrieved from http://novafilolohiia.zp.ua/index.php/new-philology/article/view/44
Section
Articles