IMPLICIT EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN THE ENGLISH-LANGUAGE POSTMODERN FICTION ТEXTS
Abstract
The article discusses the specificity of implicit representation of uncertainty by means of the English language in the British postmodern literary discourse. The data for analysis was selected from the novels written by I. McEwan, D. Mitchell and D. Lodge. Implicitness is viewed as an inherent feature of language and is a promising object for linguistic analysis, as its mechanisms are unfolded in a new way within the cognitive-discursive paradigm. Within any language, uncertainty is verbalized not only explicitly, but also through a wide range of implicit means. While explicit statements can directly express doubt or lack of certainty, implicit expressions of uncertainty add subtlety and nuance to communication. Uncertainty can be verbalized by various language means in English directly and indirectly. The English language provides a rich array of choices that enable speakers to express uncertainty implicitly. Uncertainty is a key concept of postmodernism, therefore postmodern authors attach great significance to representing it in their texts. Postmodern fiction conveys uncertainty which underlies and shapes the characters’ perception and self-identity via a number of language means and some communicative strategies that are of special interest for our research. The paper analyzes the implicit expression of uncertainty in the British postmodern fiction discourse represented by the novels of I. McEwan, D. Mitchell, D. Lodge. It has been identified that the main language means that the authors opt for are hedging, various means of expressing modality, “vague” expressions, qualifiers, euphemisms, іnterrogative sentences in inner represented speech, filler words, and aposiopesis. The article examines how their usage contributes to the nuanced portrayal of uncertainty in the Englishlanguage fiction, and in what ways the authors combine these means in order to reach their goal – give the readers the impression of the characters’ lack of certainty, hesitation, indeterminacy and doubt. The analysis reveals that these implicit meanings are not directly stated, but are suggested in the wording or can be understood from the context. The writers mostly resort to a combination of various language means that imply the characters’ uncertainty, in order to intensify the implied meanings and to make sure the reader interprets them adequately.
References
2. Gärtner J., Berberat P. O., Kadmon M., Harendza S. Implicit expression of uncertainty – suggestion of an empirically derived framework. URL: https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/ articles/10.1186/s12909-020-1990-3
3. Grice P. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press. 1989. 394 p.
4. Dynel M., Cap P. Implicitness : familiar terra incognita in pragmatics. Implicitness. From lexis to discourse. Ed. by P. Cap and M. Dynel. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017. P. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.276
5. Wittgenstein L. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul. 1974. 106 p. 6. Anderson J. R. Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. Eighth Edition. Worth Publishers. 2015. 406 p.
7. Kecskes I. Implicitness in the use of situationbound utterances. Implicitness. From lexis to discourse / Ed. by P. Cap and M. Dynel. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017. P. 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.276
8. Fetzer A. The dynamics of discourse. Implicitness. From lexis to discourse. Ed. by P. Cap and M. Dynel. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017. P. 235–257. https://doi.org/ 10.1075/pbns.276
9. Tóth M. Linguistic Metonymy : Implicitness and Co-Activation of Mental Content. Berlin : Peter Lang GmbH, 2018. 248 p.
10. Lodge D. The Art of Fiction. Viking Penguin, 1993. 240 p.
11. Prihodko G., Prykhodchenko O., Zaluzhna M., Moroshkina G. Strategies and Tactics of Evaluative Discourse. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research. Volume 129. Atlantis Press SARL, 2020. P. 1–7. URL: https://www.atlantispress. com/proceedings/isc-sai-20/125937223
12. Bareis J. A. The Implied Fictional Narrator. Journal of Literary Theory. Vol. 14, № 1/ 2020. P. 120-138. URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jlt-2020-0007
13. Iser W. The Implied Reader : Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974. 318 p.
14. The Palgrave Handbook of Violence in Film and Media. Palgrave Macmillan Cham, 2022. 529 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05390-0
15. Tauber A. I. The Triumph of Uncertainty : Science and Self in the Postmodern Age. Central European University Press, 2022. https://doi.org/10.7829/j.ctv2cw0s3h
16. Michael M. Discourse and Uncertainty : Postmodern Variations. Theory & Psychology. 1994. № 4(3). P. 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354394043006
17. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. 3rd Edition. Longman, 2000. 1680 p.
18. Kurzon D. Thematic silence as a speech act. Implicitness. From lexis to discourse / Ed. by P. Cap and M. Dynel. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017. P. 217–232. https://doi.org/ 10.1075/pbns.276
19. Kövecses Z. Metaphor : a practical introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2010. 375 p.
20. Ritchie D. “ARGUMENT IS WAR” – or is it a Game of Chess? Multiple Meanings in the Analysis of Implicit Metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol. 2003. № 18(2). P. 125–146.
SOURCES OF ILLUSTRATIVE MATERIAL
1. Mitchell D. Black Swan Green. Sceptre Book, 2006. 374 p.
2. McEwan I. Amsterdam. Anchor Books, 1999. 133 p.
3. Lodge D. A Man of Parts. Harvill Secker Random House, 2011. 460 p.